T-U-R-T-L-E Power

The absolute greatest popular art is that that captures the spirit of childhood – movies like Up and Toy Story 3 literally bring tears to my eyes, and, for someone as cynical and pessimistic as I am, it’s amazing how any Muppets encounter manages to fill me with joy for days. The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise is exactly in that vein – there’s nothing more childish than a bunch of, well, teenage mutant ninja turtles – so it was a no-brainer for me to fly up to Madison, WI this weekend (apologies for the late post…) to watch it with a friend of mine who feels the same way.

From a Ninja Turtles perspective, the movie was actually pretty OK. The Turtles had noses for some reason, and were a little too modern, perhaps – over six feet tall and crazy jacked, and they said “brah” instead of “dude” and sported long, torn masks and holsters for their weapons – but all-in-all it reminded me that I love the Ninja Turtles, and for every scene in which I wondered why Donatello’s voice was so high or Raphael was sporting a do-rag, there was a scene that made me happy because of how childishly stupid it was (I’m looking at you, DJ Mikey).

tmnt2k14

tmnt-zza
Which group would you rather share pizza with?

But purely from a good film perspective, the 2014 TMNT movie was, well, relatively atrocious. I’m not suggesting that the TMNT movie – or any TMNT movie for that matter; some of my favorite TMNT movies growing up were poorly made – should be made particularly well. (Seriously, the scene where Vanilla Ice just breaks into “Turtle Rap” while the fearsome foursome busts the foot clan inside an early ‘90s NYC club is among the greatest scenes ever filmed, in this blogger’s humble opinion.) And I’m not talking about the bigger, badder version of Turtles we got in this movie – sure, give Shredder a blade-gun with infinite ammo and make the Foot Clan a paramilitary terrorist organization for some reason. I’m talking in terms of just, like, the very basics of storytelling, the Heroes on the Half Shell deserve more than what they got in this case.

It starts at the very beginning – a shaky cam following reporter April O’Neil as she tries to get information through a tough, no-nonsense interview with the victim of a Foot Clan attack! Man, we must be watching the news as her cameraman hurries to follow her as she runs after her quarry, hot on the trail of an elusive gang of bandits! Wrong. Pan to her cameraman, leaning against the news van, camera clearly packed way. No more shaky cam for the rest of the film, no further mention of it. The only possible explanation is they cut the scene where he has the camera out, and they just never edited out or re-shot the shaky cam bit. That’s shoddy filmmaking.

Then you have the blatant storytelling flaws that I like to think even a child could pick up on – a mention of “first day of spring in NYC!” leading to a cringe-worthy “…looks like April came early this year” line, inexplicably delivered on a mountain inexplicably covered in a thick winter’s snow further-inexplicably connected by inexplicable sewer with NYC.

incontheivable!
Inexplicable!

This is a basic storytelling problem – if you are married to the idea of the snowy mountain so you can have a crazy snowy-mountain-sledding fight scene, set the movie in the winter. If you’re (for some ridiculous reason) married to the “April came early this year” pun, set it in January or February instead of December. But don’t point out how warm it is and how everyone is wearing tee shirts, then move ten miles and have a blizzard avalanche scene. It’s not hard, guys.

It doesn’t get any better – the Turtles (except Raph) get locked up in cells (inexplicably they are kept awake for this) and their blood drained in order to extract precious mutagen (formerly ooze – come on guys, let’s stick to canon here), and three Turtles have three tubes coming out of them leading to a blood… tank… thing… with four tubes of blood running in. Again, not hard to catch this error; you can even fix it in post (as I’m led to believe all film-makers are running around saying all of the time).

And this is not to mention the rest of the hilarious mutagen problems – they need anyone who has the mutagen flowing through their veins, so they capture mutagen-enhanced rat Master Splinter… then punch / stab him really hard in the gut and take the turtles instead, leaving Splinter to die. The Turtles decide they need to get the mutagen so they can give it to Splinter to save him, despite the fact that it is obviously already in his body coursing through his veins also. The bad guys also have spent 15 years trying to recreate the mutagen to no avail without knowing the Turtles are out there, but they just happen to have this contraption set up and ready to go that can separate regular blood from mutagen, and they have the pathogen that the mutagen can cure just loaded up and ready for dispersal at a moment’s notice from the top of a NYC skyscraper.

Then there’s the hilarious scene where they get their blood drained (besides the “fix it in post” problem) – which involves a blood-deficient and clearly weakened Donatello telling a panicking April that the only thing that can give them the energy to break out of their confinement is adrenaline – good thing there’s an enormous adrenaline button that takes up a quarter of conveniently-placed computer console monitoring their life signs! Of course, their first priority is to save Raphael, who’s busy getting his face ground into the dirt by Shredder, who is “gonna kill him!” But as soon as they break out of their blood-draining prisons, Shredder’s gone to catch up to the evil mastermind behind the whole plan, who’s on his helicopter on the way into New York to disperse aforementioned inexplicably-ready-to-go poison. I won’t even mention that, upon coming down from their adrenaline high, the Turtles have no further blood-loss related problems, except oh wait, I just did.

Then there’s the final battle, which occurs almost immediately after this – we see the helicopter of the Big Bad approaching the dispersal tower in NYC, and Shredder at the top of the tower… except wait, didn’t Shredder leave after him – how did he get there first? The Turtles battle it out on top of the tower, including a touching moment in which they have to hold up the entire spire so that the poison doesn’t fall off and disperse itself, killing “everyone in a 10-block radius.” Not seconds later, the spire falls off the tower, no problem, because some other problem came up, so that one’s no longer important and can be ignored.

The sad thing about this is that most of this would have been fixed with like an hour more of script writing and ten more minutes of film – you can even keep the snowy mountain in springtime. The big bad gets the blood, but he needs time to separate out the mutagen and prepare his diabolical plan. The Turtles escape and travel the long distance back to NYC to lick their wounds, develop their characters, and nurse an ailing Splinter who clearly isn’t going to make it – insert mystical reason he needs the mutagen here. Then, after a day, a week, a month, a season, April gets wind that something is going on at Big Bad’s tower that night – there’s a gala perhaps, whatever — and she’s suspicious of his motives, so she checks it out. She alerts the Turtles, they recognize the immediacy of the situation and the opportunity to get the mutagen to save Splinter (¡¿and maybe they have to rescue damsel in distress April O’Neil?!) and the final fight scene happens exactly as it did in the movie.

I’m not asking for a masterpiece here – all I’m asking is that the Turtles be given a standard, boilerplate movie plot that’s executed well. It’s not the movie treatment they need; it’s the movie treatment they deserve.

The World of Tomorrow, Today

This day began as all days began, before dawn, with the sound of music.  It came of its own volition — it was not provided by a roommate or a relative with a phonograph to simulate the rooster’s crow; its source instead was a small box on the nightstand made of metals and organic compounds, which, by means of electricity alone, could keep track of the time of day and even the day of the week and would play music at an appointed hour in order that our protagonist might rouse himself in suitable time to meet his employment obligations.  Furthermore, within the box — not substantially larger than a pocket watch — resided thousands of songs (recorded not by cornet and trombone and tuba, but by strange, electrically-amplified imitations of guitars and pianos, providing complex syncopated rhythms and layers of distortion or clarity unachievable with conventional instruments), and yet only a select few, perhaps 500 or so, would be allowed to play for this important morning task.

Having so been roused, our protagonist lay for a moment in his bed; though mid-summer, the air in his housing unit was kept cold for him through a central Temperature Status Unit and would not be allowed to warm until after he had left for work, and his bed was warm and comfortable.  Suitably steeled against the prospect of the cold, he set to the daily routine of washing himself, so that he might be presentable to his employers and fellow employees.  Said routine included washing not only his face and hands, but his entire body, by means of a spray bath, with water running over the body and disappearing into a drain.  This means of self-cleaning might be employed not once, but two or three times during a day, and could be effected entirely within the confines of a person’s residence; indeed, despite living on the fourth floor (of a 10-story building!), our protagonist was able to summon water of a desired temperature simply by maneuvering a valve, whether in the bath or in either of the sinks in his housing unit.  If asked, perhaps he could have indicated whence the water came (“the river,” or “the rain,” perhaps), but he was never asked and in truth thought little of how it arrived or, after cleansing his body, where the drain sent it.

After drying himself and applying a deodorizing paste to his body, our protagonist set to dressing himself.  He selected from his closet a pair of pleated slacks and a button-up shirt.  His clothing was of sufficient quality that it would last through years of wearing and could be easily cleaned with modern processes, but he was not of sufficient means to have employed a tailor, which was seen as rather luxurious.  Instead, he had ordered these clothes through electrogram, having selected from a catalog of available fabric patterns (summoned and displayed in less than a second on his Personal Information Interface) and provided his personal measurements.  Clothing of a suitable size had then arrived 3 days later, though he had remarked about the seemingly interminable wait at the time — other electrogram services were offering same-day deliveries.

Once dressed, he grabbed a plastomer mug and, reaching into his electronic icebox (which operated similarly to his Temperature Status Unit, removing warm air from the interior and pumping it to the outside world), he opened a canister of milk, purchased some 10 days prior at a comestibles emporium and still fresh.  He poured some of the milk from the plastomer canister into the plastomer mug before adding his coffee, which had automatically brewed that morning, having been electronically scheduled to do so the night before, before returning the milk to the electronic icebox such that it might stay fresh for another 10 days.  Armed with his morning coffee, he grabbed his Personal Information Interface for work and set out the door and down the hallway of his housing complex to take the elevator to the subterranean autostables.

The autostables were constructed as successive floors up to 30 feet below the building, and his automatic carriage was stabled at the bottom, since he typically got home later than most of the other people in his housing complex.  His automatic carriage was similar to the others in the stable (of similar proportion, carrying up to 5 people with room for luggage in the back; propelled in a similar manner; of a similar height; with specific holders for his coffee mug), yet different (dark grey where others were black or white, or red, yellow or green; 4 doors where others had 2; smooth where others were angular), though they all subscribed to various standards of efficiency, safety, and proportion so that they might all use the same infrastructure.  Every morning, he drove his automatic carriage — powered by means of the combustion of carbon-based fuels (pulled out of the very Earth itself in astounding quantities) inside an engine contained entirely within the carriage itself — up the three floors, instructing the carriage directionally through a miniaturized version of a ship’s wheel and accelerating and decelerating the carriage with pedals located on the floor.

Exiting the autostables, he conducted his carriage to the autohighway (part of the largest public works project in the history of the world, a web of roads linking towns and cities across the entire continent, designed specifically to ensure connectivity across the country by means of autocarriage, which by its inception 60 years prior had become ubiquitous), which he would drive on for ten miles before leaving it to reach his office.  The autohighway was congested with other people’s autocarriages, as it typically was at this time, so the 10-mile ride took half an hour instead of the 8 or 10 minutes it would have taken with no such congestion.  During this time, he listened to publicly available educational messages, produced throughout the country and conveyed to him upon request through a network of electronic linkages known as the World Wide Electrical Information Network, ultimately leading to a series of hundred-foot-tall towers dotting the landscape, which wirelessly broadcast information through the air that could be picked up by his pocketphone.  This day, he listened to a message produced across the continent in San Francisco about the intricacies of designing buildings (frequently tens of stories tall) such that they were exited easily in the case of fire or other such catastrophe.

His office stood halfway between the city to the east and one of the aeroports that served its 6 million inhabitants to the west.  As he conducted his autocarriage, two-hundred-foot-long aeroships made of aluminum, departing from the port and carrying hundreds of people to destinations around the globe, thundered thousands of feet overhead, kept aloft not by flapping wings as a bird, but by the air flowing over fixed metal wings at the sheer speed at which they traveled — typically hundreds of miles in an hour — and powered to that speed through means of combustion of those same Earth-drawn compounds used to power the autocarriage, run through complex turbine systems, deriving the power of an entire steam locomotive.

Arriving at the turn to his office’s autostable, he turned on his turn indicator, which flashed a light on the outside of his autocarriage that other conductors would interpret as his desire to make a left turn at the next intersection of roads.  Sitting at the intersection (an automated system, optimized around efficiently and safely conducting autocarriages through the grid of roads whose standards were subscribed to by all conductors of autocarriages, indicated that he would have to wait by means of illuminating a red-tinted light), he thought about the day ahead of him — he was employed chiefly to find specific pieces of information on the World Wide Electrical Information Network by remotely accessing Information Interface Nodes and to instruct his company’s own such IINs to automatically access and store that information themselves — he dreaded the prospect of another boring day in the same boring world.

Intro to Metallurgy

I’ve already talked a little bit about addiction (I won’t link back to it, b/c nobody wants to read that trash), but I feel the need to bring it up again in light of new evidence of its overwhelming power.  I’m not talking about the dream I had last night, in which I had so much to drink that I couldn’t fall asleep in a timely fashion (???) and had to take a Xanax (???) to fall asleep (true story, not making it up, etc.).  No, I am of course talking about the modern marvel known as electronic cigarettes.

Let’s back up here a little bit.  I am not condoning smoking; I don’t need to remind you that “tobacco use remains the single largest preventable cause of death and disease in the United States.”  I have smoked 2 cigars in my life, and I found them moderately enjoyable at best.  So concludes the history of my smoking.  I don’t intend to start smoking, I don’t see its appeal, and I almost certainly never will.    DON’T SMOKE, KIDS.

NotEvenOnce
Not even once.

When I’m walking around and I see people smoking cigarettes, I always turn to whoever I’m with and say (just loudly enough for the smokers to hear), “Oh my God. They look so cool.”  The joke comes from the world’s worst drug prevention strategy, of having teachers tell kids that “other kids will tell you it looks cool, but it doesn’t.”  Literally the best possible way to make a kid think something is cool is by telling him that the cool kids think it is and The Man doesn’t.  Anyway, the point is that in the 21st Century, it really doesn’t look that cool — people under about 35 grew up in a world where smoking killed at least one person they knew and loved, and they knew that it was smoking that did it.  (Admittedly, my grandfather died before I was born, so that might not actually be true for me.)  Smoking is — largely — seen as a disgusting habit that causes bad breath, yellow skin, rotten teeth, and kills people.

James Dean
But then again…

On the other hand, there is something that is just wildly, incalculably metal about lighting something on fire, sticking it in your face, and then — with a huge middle finger to your own mortality — taking the toxic outpourings of that fire into your very body and proclaiming you do it because you enjoy it.

You know what’s undeniably not metal?  Loading a new Pina Colada flavor E-Liquid into what a repurposed vibrator, wrapping your hand around it like you’re giving it a handy, and then sticking it in your mouth and sucking in some sweet, sweet vapor.  Notwithstanding one of my favorite headlines of all time (“E-Cigarettes Contain Powerful, Deadly Neurotoxin” on Fox News — the powerful neurotoxin was nicotine, by the way), there is almost nothing I can think of that is less cool than vaping.  That’s right, you “vape” e-cigarettes, since they produce vapor instead of smoke.

ecigs
Not pictured: Metal

And yet, at day clubs in Vegas, at night clubs … also in Vegas, and out on the streets in DC and Arlington, I see 20-something douchebags breaking out their e-cigs and sucking away at them like 4-year olds with lollipops.  I have my share of crippling insecurities, but nothing made me feel better about myself in comparison to other people than seeing a bunch grown-ass men who were bigger than me, cooler than me, and get laid more than me belittle themselves by sucking on a plastic vapor handle.

Electronic cigarettes are so incredibly far from cool that I can only see one possible explanation for their existence: nicotine addiction is the most powerful force on Earth, and if putting the nicotine in a glorified tampon applicator can’t stop it, nothing can.

12 Months Before the ‘Cast, Part II

This week, I’m picking up where we left off in Part 1 of my podcast review (perhaps more appropriately titled “Stuff I Don’t Listen To and Why I Don’t Listen To It”, or “I Get Angry At People For No Reason”).  This week, I’ll be talking about the tiny, tiny subset of podcasts that I think are even remotely worth my time to listen to, in ascending order of worthiness.

Barely Worthy

Of the six podcasts I still listen to, three of them are moderately interesting at best, and hugely infuriating at their worst.

Planet Money

I started listening to PM because I thought they would tell me about the basics of being an adult — saving, investing, planning for the future.  It turns out they’re actually a poorly-named economic-themed anecdote-based podcast.  They have some interesting tidbits, like the one about the conference that set the dollar up as the primary international currency, but an equal number that are basically pure conjecture about a dumb talking point, like the one about milk being in the back of the store.  They also have some interesting policy tidbits.  After I found out that they provide no useful information, I kept listening to them primarily because… they’re short?  They come out pretty often, which means if one episode is really boring, it’s over quickly, and maybe the next one will be moderately interesting.

One of my chief gripes with them is that they claim to be an economics podcast, but not a single one of them appears to have any economic training — they’re just reporters.  And while I understand that it’s their job to go out and find actual economists and get them to opine / spew data at people, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to expect the reporters to have an idea of what the economists are talking about.  This comes up again in the Freakonomics podcast, but nothing infuriates me more than people saying things like “It may not make sense, but to an economist…” because it implies that economists have this magical power to see the truth through the BS.  Economics is basically just the study of the allocation of scarce resources, and applied broadly enough, that’s basically what everybody does every day — allocate scarce resources, like their time and money.  They treat economists like some sort of mythical creature with God-like money knowledge, but basically anything being explained by an economist should be understandable by anyone who has ever made a decision.

The other thing that brings this podcast down is the voices of the reporters.  Zoe Chace has the single most annoying speech pattern (even worse than “vocal fry“) — seriously, it sounds like she’s viciously attacking the words as she speaks them.  And then one of the reporters has like… maybe a lisp?  There’s definitely something lispy going on, and I end up focusing way more on how he’s saying things than what he’s actually saying.  I know this is a cheap shot, but it’s actually an important part of the presentation.  Their job as radio hosts is to present things with their voices; you’d think they’d brush up on their non-regional diction and present a palatable medium to convey information.

nailsonchalkboard
Would you listen to this?

 

Representative Episode

This might be my least favorite episode — it’s not really fair, since this is basically what I do for a living, but it just drives me through the roof how they are so incredibly befuddled by the end of Trading Places, especially given that their explanation of commodities trading literally comes from the movie itself.  “I watched this whole movie and I had no idea what was going on, can you explain it?”  “Yeah, watch the movie, it explains everything.”

99% Invisible

99% Invisible is ostensibly an architecture podcast, but it turns out architecture is pretty boring and esoteric, so they broadened their focus to general design.  I actually really like this for the most part; there have been some really interesting stories (like this one about the Citigroup Center building in NYC secretly being structurally unstable and needing secret nighttime retrofits) and a lot of really cool stuff about how things got the way they are (like this one about barcodes).  The reporting is usually solid, and unlike PM, the 99PI folks actually understand what they’re talking about and add to the story.  It’s also not an actual radio show, just a podcast, which means the format is a little bit more flexible.

On the other hand, the host Roman Mars is a special kind of unbearable, self-import hipster.  He’s exactly the kind of person you would expect to tell you repeatedly he’s from San Francisco or to name his kid Mazlo — or for that matter to spell it “Mazlo” instead of “Maslow,” like a less-un-normal person would do.  It could be much worse — his soft-spoken self-importance is almost always positive, singing the high praises of the tiniest details of the most boring and mundane garbage.  Still, it’s a huge drawback to the show, especially when he’s talking about, for instance, the designs that went into creating a community for hypochondriacs who think that they are allergic to plastic and electricity being near them.

Representative Episode

My favorite episode so far has to be the one about futuristic-looking interfaces in sci-fi movies; in particular, I think the “design apology” concept adds a cool dimension to a lot of these movies.

dontgetcocky
Seriously, it completely changed my view of this scene.

Freakonomics Radio

The Freakonomics podcast is well-produced and entertaining in much the same way that the books are, and while Dubner suffers from the same “… but to an economist!” problem as Planet Money, he at least understands that it’s not so much about being an economist as it is about thinking in a certain way and evaluating decision spaces, and he’s a surprisingly good interviewer.  The podcast also explores a larger economic space than PM, embracing behavioral economics and focusing less on the monetary aspects of economics.  The show also features a rich set of experts on various economic subjects, and excels whenever Levitt stops by, primarily because he sounds like such a goofball.

The reason this doesn’t make the “best of the best” cut for me is that I think most episodes lack a meaningful conclusion.  This could be viewed as a plus, since the best conclusions are almost always going to be “it depends,” but the subjects usually aren’t interesting enough as talking points to make it really engaging.  Also, I spend a fair amount of time yelling at the radio when they start discussing problems I think have obvious or incorrect solutions, and now that the Silver Line is open it’s much less acceptable for me to yell than it was when I commuted in my car.

Yelling
I swear I’m yelling at my phone, not at you.

Representative Episode

The episode about quitting is probably the most representative episode — basically, taking a common maxim and examining whether or not it’s true from an economic perspective (in this case, examining the return on allocation of scarce time).

I also really liked his interview with Takeru Kobayashi.  Who knew the hotdog champ had studied economics?

Good Stuff

Honestly, these two and the winner below are all up there on my list of favorites.  But I’m ranking things, so they have to appear in some order.

Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me!

WWDTM is my go-to Friday podcast, since it puts me in a good mood for the weekend.  It’s also the most likely to be interesting for long journeys and the least likely for me to zone out on.  It’s a usually informative and frequently hilarious news quiz show, hosted by Peter Sagal with Bill Kurtis as a scorekeeper for three panelists, typically drawn from a pool of B-level comedians (basically the ones most likely to be on NPR…).  They also feature listener call-in games, which range from impossibly easy (the limerick game, wherein Bill Kurtis reads a limerick with the last word or phrase missing, and the user just has to figure out what rhymes, and people will routinely be like “Hmmm… you said ‘turple…’ then ‘urple…’ and it’s a color… so … orange?”  It’s incredible when someone doesn’t get it.) to impossibly hard (the fake news game where each contestant reads a ridiculous news story and the user has to guess which one is real).  I can’t imagine what it’d be like to call into that show and be told that you’re going to be on the fake news story.  I think I would cry.

There’s two things wrong with the podcast — the first is clip shows, which they do about every other month, when they’re on vacation, and the second is some of the panelists.  A lot of the panelists are great — Roy Blount, Jr. and Tom “We’ll leave the light on for you” Bodett are my favorites — but some of them are cringe-inducing, in particular this one guy, I can never remember who, whose laugh is … whatever the opposite of infectious is?  It’s like a vaccine — a weakened form of laughter that stops you from ever contracting the condition once you’ve experienced it.  But I’m sure he’s a great guy or whatever.  Hilariously, they also have Bobcat Goldthwait as a panelist.

bobcat goldthwait
Yeah… that guy.

Represenatative Episode

The episodes are all pretty similar, so I just tried to find one with both Tom Bodett and Roy Blount, Jr.  This one features Itzhak Perlman!

Backstory

Backstory takes a theme and explores its past in America.  The hosts are three American history professors from around Virginia, each with a specialty in the 18th, 19th, or 20th Century.  They do several 5-10 minute pieces on various aspects of the issue, typically consisting of interviews with experts or a story from one of their producers. The themes range from hot-topic issues (the “I Have a Dream” speech on its 50th anniversary) to somewhat more mundane fare (fashion in America), but the pieces are consistently enlightening and usually help to contextualize the theme and how it fits into other themes throughout history.  (In the aforementioned fashion example, for instance, they explore the contradiction of the white settlers “civilizing” mission with the Enlightenment’s fondness for and closeness to nature, and how this plays out politically with Benjamin Franklin’s coon-skin hat in France during the American Revolution.)

ben_franklin_noble_savage
A look later appropriated and expanded on by one Rep. D. Crockett, (NR-TN)

Occasionally, the podcasts can be a little dry, and I have a tendency to zone out.  Also, frequently the call-ins are either yawn-inducing or cringe-worthy.  But all-in-all, as a history buff, I think this is one of the better history podcasts available — certainly the best one I’ve found so far.

Representative Episode

It’s hard to come up with a really good representative episode, because they’re all of pretty similar quality.  I chose this one because it’s topical now.

The Big Winner: Radiolab

I get the most excited when I see that I have a new Radiolab to listen to.  It’s the best-produced (some might say over-produced?) of the podcasts I listen to, and it consistently provides interesting stories that are at least mostly science-based.  It’s hosted by Jad Abumrad and Robert Krulwich, and although Krulwich frequently plays the straight man, debating theories they’re presenting with such clever arguments as “I just feel like that can’t be true,” he’s usually saved by Abumrad, who convinces the listener of the plausibility of whatever’s being presented.  Also, they were just on Colbert.

Occasionally, they do a music episode, and I usually hate those.  But otherwise, the show is top-notch in entertainment and information, and I just wish it came out more often.

 Representative Episode

This one is actually totally not representative, since it’s their live show, but it is my favorite, because dinosaurs.  Just stop listening after the dinosaur part, though, because the rest was kinda boring and trippy, if I remember correctly.

This one was really good and is probably much more of a representative episode.


That does it for The Only Podcast Review You’ll Ever Need.  If you know of any more I should listen to, throw them my way!

 

12 Months Before the ‘Cast, Part I

For three years, I drove to and from work either listening to The Kane Show (check that link and you’ll understand the quality of the programming) or music off of my iPod.  I wasted between an hour and an hour and a half every day this way– that’s 4-6% of my precious, precious time.  Last July, I decided to change that, and I started listening to podcasts in an effort to at least pretend to improve my mind.  A year later, I’ve been around the block enough to know what’s worthwhile in the podcast field.  Please enjoy this, Part I of The One and Only Official Review of Podcasts I’ve Listened To.

Stinkers

I frequently run out of the six or so podcasts that I still do listen to, so I can’t really afford to be that picky about what I subscribe to.  I am anyway.  I’ve completely given up on the following podcasts, in order of terribleness:

The Cracked Podcast

I apologize in advance for the length of this review; I just feel heartbreakingly betrayed by this one, because I read just way, way too much Cracked.  So much so that I frequently misrepresent stuff I read in its articles as fact.  It’s… it’s one of the worst things about me, really.  I spend most weekends delaying productivity by watching the stupid videos they make for hours.

So, when I first decided to subscribe to the Cracked podcast, I thought it would be either an awesome list of fun / hilarious stuff I didn’t know, like a radio version of my old favorite video series, or it’d be an awesome fun pop culture talking-about-session, like a radio version of my new favorite video series.  (I specifically link that one because there is, no joke, a Cracked podcast entitled “Actors Who Do Weirdly Specific Stuff in Every Movie.”  I haven’t listened to it, but it’s safe to say it’s boring and sucks.)

Let me give you an idea of what listening to the Cracked podcast the first time was like.  I listened to A Prairie Home Companion growing up, and I can remember picturing Garrison Keillor as a sort of handsome, older type — sort of an American Sean Connery.  And then I saw him, and it completely changed my view of the show — there was no way to unsee what I had seen.

 

FaceForRadio
Yeah… that’s a face for radio.

This is exactly how I felt when I listened to one of my (formerly) favorite Cracked authors, David Wong, on the podcast.  He wrote some silly “horror” novels (one or more of which was made into a movie starring Paul Giamatti) that were at least passably entertaining, and he generally made interesting articles and stuff.  But it turns out he’s like a dour, boring late-30-something boring guy who’s really boring and dour and… sad?  He’s really sad.

Another important factor is that Cracked works really well in written, hyperlinked format, so you can check out the studies and articles that are being used to justify their wild claims.  (Not that I ever do, but that one could).  Their videos work really well because they are well scripted.  Instead, the Cracked podcast takes your favorite people from the site and renders them boring and useless as they get into boring and useless conversations about stuff they half-remember from articles you’ve already read with head Cracked editor and most boring and useless person alive, Jack O’Brien.  Guys, what I’m getting at here is that the Cracked podcast is boring and useless.

BoringAndUseless
I may look interesting, but guys trust me on this one: I’m boring and useless.

Representative Episode

Take this episode, with aforementioned David Wong and Jack O’Brien taking on “the true meaning of Christmas,” without any regard for what Christmas actually means historically.  Here’s a hint: it’s not “let’s get drunk and celebrate just to spite winter,” as they suggest, and instead has everything to do with role reversal, as they explicitly say it doesn’t.

This American Life

I’m going to catch flack for this one, but This American Life is boring, and Ira Glass is an annoying jackwad.  Honestly, my least favorite thing about TAL is Ira Glass; the stories go back and forth between mildly entertaining (think David Sedaris-level entertainment, where you say, “How thoroughly amusing!” and then move on with your life) and total snooze-fests, but Ira Glass just sounds like the kind of guy who grew up knowing that he was a dullard and decided to make up for it by getting like really in touch with his emotions, so that he could convey his true sense of wonder at everything from Michelangelo’s David to the masterpiece his barista just made whipping a fork through the milk in his cafe au lait.

Stupid Face
Looks like it, too.

Otherwise, the show is probably fine.

Representative Episode

I was sort of poisoned against the show because the first one I listened to was their live show, and about half the show is Ira “My Voice is Stupid and So’s My Face” Glass just… describing things that were happening on the stage?  It actually made me physically uncomfortable how poignant he thought every single moment was.

https://soundcloud.com/this-american-life/464-invisible-made-visible

Stuff You Should Know / Stuff You Missed in History Class

Hey team!  Do you want people to read off of wikipedia pages at you?  Great!  You can listen to the How Stuff Works podcasts!

This group really suffers from the same thing that the Cracked podcast suffers from, which is an inability to navigate to related information when you get bored.  Also that the people talking are boring and haven’t scripted anything out ; it’s literally just two people talking about what they found out about something.  They don’t even meet up after they do their research to talk about what they want to talk discuss or what was most interesting, they just put their initial discussion on the air and call it a podcast.  (They actually admitted this in an episode once, but I’m not going to go back and find it.)  The history one is usually a little bit better, but the delivery makes it sound like a middle school powerpoint presentation; they just sort of list facts and describe them as “really cool” instead of tying people and events into larger historical contexts.  Ultimately, it’s a waste of time.

Representative Episode

Some of the topics are actually really interesting, and despite the format, pretty infromative — I learned a good bit about crack, for instance, and about the Irish potato famine — but some are really boring or just poorly done.  Please enjoy my two least favorites.  Also, I couldn’t figure out how to embed their tracks in under 3 minutes, so they must be a pretty fly-by-night operation.

Stuff That’s Cool I Guess But Not For Me

Song Exploder

The idea for this one is actually totally rad.  Take a song and bring the musician on to talk about what went into creating it.  It’s a design podcast at heart, and I’m fascinated by design — the incredible amount of thought that goes into the seemingly simplest things has always fascinated me.  When I hear a song, I typically think about it as a guitar part, a bass part, a drum part, and vocals, and they all sort of work together and a song comes out, but it basically follows standard musical practice with fourths and fifths and whatever.  Maybe, if you’re going to do something crazy, you add in a keyboard.

It turns out that there’s about 30 other layers in the background, and all of them are tiny little design choices that completely change the song (“I used the theme that’s running through the bass line for the first two verses and put it up two octaves on a steel drum, but drop the resolution to the major chord so that it really gives you that sense of Caribbean heartbreak”).  Having the artist walk through these is fascinating; it’s basically VH1 Storytellers, but for the whole song instead of just the lead singer.

The hardest-working boy band in the world!
A media bias first brought to light through the ruthless journalistic pursuits of D12 in their seminal work “My Band.”

My principal concern with this show is that I’m not into enough hip, cool music to know anything about the songs they’re exploding.  Their episode list includes such bands as Poliça, Sea Wolf, and Nite Jewel, none of whom I’ve even heard of.  Even the bands I’ve heard of like Garbage have songs I’ve never heard of (in this case, something off a 2012 album — did you know Garbage was still making music?).  I subscribed for awhile in the hopes that something I’d ever heard of would come up, but it never did, and eventually I gave up.

Representative Episode

The first episode I heard was something I’d heard of, and it was totally rad.  Check out this explosion of the House of Cards main theme.

https://soundcloud.com/hrishihirway/song-exploder-no-7-jeff-beal

The Memory Palace

The Memory Palace is pretty much what This American Life wishes it could be.  It’s principally a story-telling podcast, and it presents well-told, slice-of-life stories that conjure images and emotions associated with a certain time and place.  It just happens to primarily focus on times that are not this time rather than attempting to document the present (and as a result one of the strongest emotions it conjures tends to be nostalgia).

My primary issue with this podcast is that it is very short (usually ~5 minutes) and it comes out rarely (~once per month, maybe?).  I basically got sick of seeing it not be updated on my list of podcasts and took it off.  Also, because I only listened to a few episodes, it’s somewhat difficult for me to be sure that I wouldn’t have eventually found it too sappy, boring, or, honestly, pretentious.  But I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt, because the episodes I listened to were pretty good, and I do love history.

Representative Episode

I can’t seem to find a good embed link for my favorite episode about the day that Niagara Falls stopped falling, but I can get a link from one of my other favorite podcasts, who occasionally use his stories in theirs:

https://soundcloud.com/backstory/the-fox-sisters-from


So concludes Part I of The One and Only Official Review of Podcasts I’ve Listened To.  Come back next week for Part II: Podcasts I Actually Still Listen To!

Livin’ on a Prayer

It’s well known at this point that I have a bunch of New Year’s resolutions and that, when I run out of things to talk about otherwise, I go back to writing about them.  Well, since I have nothing else to write about, and since, to quote the “great” Jon F. Bongiovi, Jr., “we’re halfway there” with respect to 2014, I figured it was time for another update.

Weekly Resolutions

There are roughly 52 weeks / year, which means we should be about 26 weeks into the year up through July 1.  Here’s how I’ve done in weekly resolutions up to now.

  • Work out 5 times / week:  24/26.  Technically this is A- to A range, but at least one of those weeks I worked out 6 times.  Moreover, I managed to work out 5 times a week on my 3 week vacation, and I’ve recently turned up the dial a bit (see BF%, below).  I give myself a solid A; short of an A+, but still pretty good.
  • Sleep 56h / week: 2/26, F.  Maybe even F-.  I think I have to face the music on this one; it’s completely incompatible with the next resolution, since I have trouble falling asleep, and even on weekends when I don’t have to get out of bed it’s difficult for me to get 8 hours of sleep.  I’ll keep tracking it, but I doubt it’ll make the list for next year.
  • Wake up earlier: 7/26 on getting into the office before 8:00 5 days a week.  This, quite frankly, is pitiful — I give myself an F.  I think if I relaxed the constraint to 8:15 or so, I’d probably be sitting at about 18 or 20 instead, and if I relaxed it to 4 days per week before 8:15 I’d be sitting at about 22.  Recent efforts have been unhinged by success in…
  • 1 Date / week: 19, but if you just count overall dates I’m probably sitting somewhere in the 40s.  Admittedly, recent dating efforts have been concentrated on one person, but that was the entire point of the resolution anyway.  I give myself an A here.
  • Contact 1 long-distance friend / day: 22/26, largely due to missing a single day here and there, and vacation, when it was exceedingly difficult to contact anyone.  I give myself an A here also, since I think I’ve only really missed two days.
  • Write 1x / week: 25 / 26.  I managed to keep this up during my vacation, but I’ve fallen off a bit since.  Don’t worry, I actually have a ton of boring nonsense to write about — I’ve just had trouble making time to do so, since I’ve been traveling on weekends a lot recently.  I’m in town for a good stretch for the rest of the summer, so I shouldn’t have any trouble here.  I give myself a cautious A, with the caveat that what I’ve written recently is uninspired and vapid, and I really need to step up my game.
  • Music 2 hours / week: 14 / 26.  I missed a few weeks due to vacation, and I missed a few weeks because I was like 20 minutes short.  That said, I’ve worked my way through almost the entirety of the Justin Guitar beginner’s course (which, if I haven’t shilled for it yet, I will now: it’s pretty fantastic.  He knows exactly what to practice and how to practice it, separating the skill areas and giving techniques with measurable results; he teaches chords first, then notes, so you can play songs from the beginning; he emphasizes ear training so you can pick up songs and think critically about your own playing), and at this point I can play a pretty wide variety of songs and styles and think of at least one way to play pretty much any chord, or something near enough that it sounds OK.  I’ve even more-or-less reached the point where I can see a new chord and sort of instinctively figure it out and switch to it, and I know just enough about music theory and finger shapes and the notes on the guitar to create any major / minor / V or VII chord I don’t know.  Despite batting just over .500 on this one, I give myself a B, tinging toward B+.  A by EOY if I can play through the beginner’s songbook and have mastered switching barre chords.

Yearly Resolutions

These are the resolutions I made for the entire year.  This category is pretty embarrassing, for exactly the reason I pointed out in my original post — if you have a full year to accomplish them, you’re going to put them off over and over and over until suddenly the year is over and you can’t do them anymore.

  • Body fat percentage: This hasn’t gone down.  Like, at all.  When I gave up drinking for Lent, I expected it to go down, and it didn’t.  When I went on a cruise and ate 3 meals every day for dinner alone, I expected it to go up, and it didn’t.  At one point I started eating spinach salads every day for lunch, and I immediately lost about 10 lb and 2-3% body fat.  Then it came back.  It hasn’t gone away since.  I’m forced to believe that either my scale is broken (unlikely…) or I’m at what is really a healthy weight for me.  I’ve also re-emphasized cardio in my workouts, where if I have time once my workout is done I’ll try to get in some additional treadmill time (frequently sprint intervals), and I’ve at least started to look like I have lower body fat, although my scale doesn’t seem to believe that that’s the case.  Either way, I’m not going to get down to 10% this year, and probably ever again.  I give myself an F, but with the caveat that I’ll put that up to a passing grade if at the end of the year I at least almost look like I have a 6-pack.  Next year I will make this a more realistic goal.
  • Olympic Triathlon: This one just isn’t happening.  I haven’t biked to work.  I think biking is scary and dangerous (although admittedly not so bad on bike trails as on roads).  F-.
  • Dance lessons: Also has not happened; not on the cruise, not anywhere.  In fact, I went to a wedding recently, and my inability to dance was pretty embarrassing, frankly.  I should see if the girl mentioned in “1 Date / week” above is interested in taking lessons with me; my impression is she is similarly in possession of two left feet.  F.
  • Join / form a band: F.  Just F.  I literally don’t think I know anyone anymore who plays anything.
  • Coursera: I couldn’t finish a course I was taking earlier on Python because I “had to” go to Europe for three weeks, but it was a really easy course, and I will likely take it again if it comes back up.  Right now I’m taking a machine learning course that looks pretty promising; it was also apparently one of the first courses Coursera offered.  I give myself a C right now, with a real chance to rescue that to an A by EOY.
  • Survive: Hangin’ on by a thread!  C at best.

Conclusion

Overall grade: C.  For the most part, I’ve gone a bit downhill since the last time I checked in, which is frustrating.  On the other hand, I’ve seen a lot of progress in the things I really wanted to get done this year — I feel pretty good about my overall fitness level, I’ve been pretty successful dating, I’ve stayed in contact with a number of friends I haven’t seen in awhile (although I need to do better on that front, since it’s mostly the same group of 7-10 friends every week), I’ve gained some facility on the guitar.  The real thing I think I’ve done is identify certain things I just don’t care that much about (e.g., getting to work early) and certain things that are likely infeasible (56 hours of sleep, 10% body fat), and the key takeaway is that next year I’ll need to amend them in some fashion.  There’s still a lot of things I want to get out of this year that I haven’t done, and I’ll also need to start being proactive on that front, lest the year slip by and I haven’t managed to become even passable on a dance floor.  I’m sure I’ll check in with a final report card in six months, if not before.

#USMutantNinjaTurtles

“World Cup, blah blah, soccer — or should I say, “football!” — blah blah, American apathy, blah blah, we’re bad at this sport.”  That’s pretty much all I’ve heard on the radio and TV for the last three weeks.  This has ranged from the US Soccer Federation’s grand vision for soccer in America played out on the Freakonomics podcast to Ann Coulter’s recent absolutely hilarious anti-soccer rant, which shows she clearly has no clue what soccer is or what the rules are (I can’t resist picking it apart point-by-point, so here I go:

  • Average NFL game: > 3 hours.  Average MLB Game: 2 hours, 58 minutes.  Average NBA game: 2 hours, 18 minutes.  Average World Cup Group Stage game?  Surprisingly hard to find, since the halves are 45 minutes and halftime can’t exceed 15 (compared to > 30 minutes for a Super Bowl halftime show), so let’s say 6 min stoppage time + 45 + 45 + 15 = 1 hour, 51 minutes.
  • Ronaldo. Ronaldinho.  Beckham. Pele.  These are soccer legends.  They are national and international heroes on a scale that Peyton Manning and Tom Brady will never achieve.  Bradley, on the other hand, after coughing up a ball at mid-field with :30 to go against Portugal, is a national pariah.  Yes, it was his fault, let’s never forget that.
  • Every other sport is co-ed at the kindergarten level; sex-specific traits (like increased muscle mass and height for boys and top-heaviness for girls) that account for co-ed sports becoming less competitive do not typically present themselves until puberty.  Anyone who’s played little league or watched The Little Giants can tell you this.
  • It is obviously not a lot harder to score with a bunch of 300-pound idiots trying to hump you into submission, as judged by her previous statement.
  • You are describing youth soccer at the Y.  Your statement about juice boxes and ribbons also applies to Little League and pee wee football.
  • You’re not allowed to use a bat in football.  What actually separates man apart from lesser beasts is that we use tools.
  • I have literally never seen an article indicating that women’s basketball even exists.  Your own article, in the meantime, does indicate that soccer is catching on.
  • We use our local system of measurement, but for scientific calculations the metric system is easier to work with.  I visualize 147.2 centimeters as roughly a belt and a half.  How do you visualize 79.8 lb?
  • “Record ratings for world cup” in the US would indicate that soccer is actually catching on. People watched the women’s game because it was the finals, and it was against arch-rival nation China.
  • Ted Kennedy’s 1965 immigration law probably didn’t affect a whole lot of people’s great-grandfathers.  However, I like soccer as much as the next guy, and it’s catching on with me.  Maybe that’s just the commy-Euro-legacy of my great-grandfather, who came to the US from Ireland.  You can trace the anti-American tendencies in my family through his son, who had the gall* to invade Normandy and Korea with that bastion of anti-Americanism, the United States Army.  Admittedly, after he won World War II, he did marry an English girl… who worked for NASA while they put a man on the freaking moon.
spent
…aaaaand I’m spent

).

I don’t necessarily disagree with her stance that soccer isn’t catching on, or event that it shouldn’t catch on, but the argument she makes to get there is childish, bigoted, and ill-informed.  Like I said, I like soccer as much as the next guy — I watch it every four years and root for the Stars and Stripes (I’m wearing red, white, and blue gym clothes right now).  I bought a Jozy Altidore jersey.  I might even go to an MLS game after the cup.  I think soccer could catch on in the US, and I’d be happy if it did.  But there is something distinctly off-putting about soccer for the American audience…

Because soccer is the Vietnam War of sports.  In last Sunday’s game against Portugal, we played 94 and a half minutes of winning soccer, and we still couldn’t win the war.  This is a truly appealing aspect of soccer for many fans; the fact that at any minute, a small mistake could lead to a scoring opportunity (combined with generally low scoring in the game) means that neither team is rarely ever that far out of the game.  In sports like baseball and basketball, teams play each other repeatedly (especially in playoff situations), so small differences in talent eventually make themselves known and the objectively better team has a better chance of winning the series than of winning any one game.  In soccer, as in American football, the games are so grueling that series just aren’t possible, but unlike in AmFoot (as I will never call it again), in soccer the worse team can basically sit on its heels and play a sort of guerrilla defense to just prevent the better team from scoring (see USA-Germany).  This leads to closer games, which leads to more exciting games, but also higher chances that the worse team can come out of nowhere and tie (USA-Portugal) or win (USA-Ghana).

SexyRonaldo
The beautiful Ho Chi Minh of Soccer

And don’t even get me started on ties.  As (apparently?) Navy coach Eddie Erdelatz said after tying Duke (GO DUKE), “Ties are like kissing your sister.”  Now think about the fact that the entire country was rooting for a tie against Germany, because a tie would guarantee that we advance to the knockout round.  If a tie is like kissing your sister, rooting for a tie is like, what, masturbating to her?  And we were also rooting for a tie between Portugal and Ghana (which would have also advanced us — see #6), and I think that’s like jerking it while watching the Lannister twins bone next to the corpse of their dead son (Spoiler alert!).  Americans are predisposed to hate ties, and soccer is, at its nature, a draw-producing sport. The NHL eliminated the tie from the game and introduce shootouts in order to boost viewership.  I don’t suspect soccer will follow suit.

Siskiss
SPOILER ALERT

That said, in honor of today’s game, here’s a reason why the U.S. should love soccer.  We love an underdog story, and the U.S. Men’s National Team are definitely underdogs.  When else in the last 100 years of American history has the US been an underdog?  Think about it — the third-most populous nation on Earth, more advanced than any other nation, with a military budget accounting for over a third of total worldwide military expendituresa land that invented electricity, is facing a country barely 50 years old, with a population well under 10% the size of ours, who has to turn off its only major industrial center so that everyone can get power to watch the game against us, and that country is favored?  That doesn’t happen anywhere else.

But we made it out of the group stage!  And we almost beat those pesky Portuguese, including that beautiful Ronaldo.  Today, we face a tiny European country that’s best known for being sandwiched in between other European countries, and that country is heavily favored.  Even though we’re underdogs, I believe that we will win.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uEpcfonkt4


 

* Or should I say, “Gaul?”

In Defense of the Self-Driving Car

Awhile ago, I wrote a “controversial” post about the impending robotopia.  I thought I’d follow up on that with a prime example of the incredible efficiency gains that could be seen from automating an industry, plus the inherent downsides and the inevitable fight to stop it from happening.  I hope it will become clear that the gains far outweigh the costs, and that we should figure out another way to mitigate the effects of the costs so that we can reap the huge benefits of this developing technology.  I’m of course talking about the self-driving car (do try to contain your surprise, I know that took you off guard).

Nice title

I think that most people view the self-driving car as a gimmicky luxury good or concept car, similar to the electric car before Tesla came along (sidenote: the Tesla model S is a magical space car and I think everyone should own one), but the truth is that this concept showcases the mind-bending transformative power of automation.  There are of course obvious benefits — imagine reading the paper as you drive to work!  Woo, how exciting.  But apply that concept to your bar-hopping trip last weekend — no matter how drunk you are, the computer driving the car isn’t.  And all of a sudden the self-driving car has saved 10,000 lives a year in this country alone.  And it keeps going; almost every one of the 30,000+ traffic-related deaths in this country each year is due to human error.

We’ve already transformed the world, and we’ve only seen the most obvious improvements; we haven’t even scratched the surface of the potential of this technology.  The inefficiencies of our current system stem from the fact that each car is driven by a single human with imperfect knowledge.  Now imagine a fully-autonomous, networked transportation system.  Cars would be able to know the future routes of all nearby cars and act accordingly; completely eliminating the potential for nearby drivers to do something unexpected means you can pack cars closer together and they can travel faster.  Knowing what’s coming up ahead means cars won’t succumb to every commuter’s nightmare, the traffic wave.  Moreover, knowledge of global congestion patterns and application of a locational marginal pricing scheme (think HOT lanes, but everywhere) that allows computers to take the least-cost route to a destination (or even propose alternative destinations that avoid congestion), and you’ve significantly reduced congestion on the roads.  But wait!  There’s more!  You can suddenly change the rules of the road if the entire fleet of domestic transportation is automated.  We all agree to travel on the right side of the road, for instance, and so heavily-trafficked roads have many lanes in each direction, and often only half of them are in use as traffic flows predominantly into or out of a city depending on the time of day.  A fully-automated fleet could optimally use both sides of the road, on a 4-lane highway for instance by using 3 lanes in one direction in the morning and 3 in the other at night.  Many rapidly-developing nations like India and the Philippines suffer from massive traffic jams as their infrastructure rapidly becomes overburdened by cars; it’s estimated that the Philippines loses up to $2.4B per day from traffic alone in wasted productivity time.  Reducing that by even a factor of 50% would be an incredible boon to their economy and future development.  Reduced congestion has secondary benefits as well, like reducing carbon emissions (fewer cars on the road at any given time, and more efficient behavior while they’re on the road — less “city” traffic).

And traffic reduction is just one more fairly obvious effect of an autonomous fleet of cars; there are a thousand more benefits, most of them likely unforeseen.  You can make cars lighter or redesign the interior for safety purposes; a global taxi system could eliminate the need for parking or garages, transforming cities and suburbs and increasing efficiency of land use; biking and walking in cities may increase as automated vehicles are better equipped to avoid them, and so on.  Current estimates suggest that the US alone could save between $700B and $2.2 trillion a year in the US alone, assuming 100% adoption of the technology.  That’s a whopping 4-14% of GDP.

Crappy-looking driverless car
We can even redesign it to look way cooler than this nerdbox.

Of course, this doesn’t come without a cost; there are inevitable risks associated with this technology (malicious attacks on the transportation network, increased urban sprawl, etc.)  But the biggest risk is that it never happens at all.  The bureau of labor statistics suggests there are over 170,000 taxi drivers and chauffeurs and 10 times as many truck drivers in the US, and every single one of them will be put out of business.  That’s an enormous demographic shift as over 1% of the labor force (currently ~155 million) is suddenly unemployed (although presumably many would be able to get jobs in other industries in the short term).  Anyone familiar with cab agencies’ fights with Uber knows that these industries aren’t going to let the self-driving car take their jobs without a fight; they are going pursue every avenue to preserve their livelihoods.  And while even $700B seems like a crazy number at a national level compared to a 1% bump in unemployment, at the local level you can bet it will start to skew in favor of the cabbies and truckers, especially in a time where preserving jobs and creating jobs are buzzwords on the campaign trail.

This is why I say we must come to some acceptable solution that allows the Googles of the world creating these innovative and transformative technologies to profit from them, yet preserves the quality of life of the millions that are displaced by it.  We cannot allow ourselves to lose sight of the incredible potential global gains at the expense of the few; instead, we should apply a portion of those gains to mitigate the expenses.  It’s the only way we move forward.

A Keen Sense of Destiny

Today was a bit busy, as I needed to find a new place to live — perhaps a story for another day.  However, as long promised, I have provided another Dirk Danger story, this one written while I was in college, and undoubtedly the best (actually I quite like it, unlike… some of the others), and shortest (hooray!).  If you think the rest of the DD stories are boring and stupid (I don’t blame you!), I suggest you read…

 


DIRK DANGER

in

A Keen Sense of Destiny

Flora Heartwood walked through the halls in the downtown office building, checking each door for a stenciled “DIRK DANGER, P.I.”  Walking past such notables as “ARCH TARSAL, Foot Inspector” and “SUE HEMMINGWAY, Seamstress,” Flora couldn’t help but wonder where these names came from.  She paused outside Dirk’s door, applying more scarlet lipstick to her plump lips.  She fluffed her long, wavy brown hair, unbuttoned another button on her blouse, and knocked.

“Enter,” came a dark, deep voice from inside the room.  She pushed open the door and saw a man of dark complexion and five o’clock shadow sitting behind a mahogany desk, slouching in his chair with his feet on the desk.  The room was trimmed in the same dark wood, and in the corner stood a hat rack with a beige fedora perched on top, and beneath it a matching trench coat.  “What can I do for you, Miss…”

“Heartwood.  Mrs. Flora Heartwood,” she said.  “My husband has gone missing, and I hear you’re the best in the business.”

Mrs. Heartwood, you hear right.”  He took his feet down from the desk and sat up.  “I presume you are referring to flooring magnate Mr. Edward Heartwood, who was last reported seen some twelve days ago?  What took you so long to see me, if you don’t mind my asking?”

“I thought I should see how the authorities would do.  Needless to say, they haven’t done very well,” she said, frowning slightly.  “I was hoping you could do better.”

“Well ma’am, I probably could, but you’ll have to wait to find out.  It’s almost five o’clock.  And it’s Friday,” said Dirk, checking his watch.  “I’m afraid I can’t do anything for you until Monday.”

“But sir, I saw your advertisement in the paper, it said you’d solve any case if it intrigued you enough or the money was there.  I assure you the case is interesting and the compensation is great.  What can I do to persuade you?”

“Mrs. Heartwood, if you saw that ad then you know it listed my hours.”  To her disappointed look he added, “Ma’am, I take my work seriously.  But I seriously don’t work on weekends.  Come back Monday.”  And with that he put his feet back on the desk and motioned toward the door.

Flora Heartwood redid her button and walked angrily toward the door.  As she left, she turned around to see Dirk one last time.  “Maybe I will.  Or maybe I’ll just go down to Arch Tarsal and get a foot massage.  How is it that everyone in this God damned office building has such ridiculous fake names?  Could you be any more stereotypical?”  Needless to say, she closed the door just a little too hard as she left.

It is a matter of course that as a private investigator, Dirk Danger is assumed to have changed his name to better suit his profession.  In fact, it is largely assumed that most of what Dirk does is an act, and Mrs. Flora Heartwood was probably thinking this as she walked down the hall.  No one in this day and age works in a darkly lit mahogany office with a half-finished cigar in the mahogany ashtray, a green lamp on a mahogany desk, a trench coat and a fedora on a mahogany coat rack and their name in all caps stenciled on the large frosted glass window in their mahogany door.  Nobody still wore suits to work, much less a trench coat or a hat.  This was the twenty-tens, for goodness sake.  And yet Dirk Danger had all those things, and the name to go with them.

It is, of course, true that most of what Dirk Danger does is an act.  He does not, for instance, smoke cigars.  Nor does he drink whiskey during work hours, yet there is a decanter filled with the finest bourbon sitting in his office. But he always solves the case.  Always.  Because someone who was born into the name Dirk Danger doesn’t become a janitor.  Nor a lawyer, nor a doctor, nor a dentist for that matter.  If your father named you Dirk Danger, you’d be the best damn private I in the city, because someone who’s name is Dirk Danger needs to be; and Dirk Danger is exactly that.  So how did Dirk get the name that led him down this inevitable career path?

Our story commences in the late 1920s, in Bavaria. There lived a young banker, Georg von Stirpitz, whose father, and owner of the bank, had recently passed away.  Georg von Stirpitz had, some ten years previously, been stationed on the eastern front as a boy of sixteen and had played a quiet and largely unimpressive role in defeating the Russians, but before he could be redeployed to the west the war was lost.  Upon his return home, he married his sweetheart, Maria-Magdalena, and settled down to his father’s business, where he plodded along for quite some time.

However, by 1928 things were starting to turn south for the young banker.  He was twenty-eight years old, had been married for almost ten years, and had yet to produce a single child.  What’s more, his father had just died and his job was no longer secure.  His father had left the bank to his older brother, Wilhelm, and there were rumors that Wilhelm was about to sell the bank to the highest bidder, then keep all the money for himself.  When Wilhelm did exactly this, the highest bidder released young Georg to fend for himself, leaving only a tiny severance package.  (Little did they know it at the time, but within a year that severance package would be worth more than the bank itself.)

Georg knew not what to do.  His father was dead, his sole inheritance lost and his brother had skipped town with a wad of cash.  Georg was jobless and would soon lose his home, but he had a wife to think about and was still hoping to start a family.  There was nothing for Georg in Germany anymore.  He decided to move to America.

Georg was a hapless man, but not a dumb one. He had spent several summers in England as a child, and could speak the King’s English; in fact he had quite an affinity for Anglo-Saxon civilization, which was one of the reasons that he had been stationed on the eastern front instead of in the west.  Yet, however anti-German were the States in the wake of the Great War, the British were far worse, so Georg decided that America was the place to be.  Of course, when he arrived he had decided that he and his wife would change their names from the almost comically German “Georg and Maria-Magdalena von Stirpitz” to something similar, but more American or British, in the hopes that the Yanks would mistake him for British wherever he went.

Georg spent the last of his severance pay to purchase tickets on a steam ship leaving from Amsterdam in May 1929, and arrived in New York City in June.  He knew that his relative youth and education would probably allow him to stay in the country, and it did.  He was handed the immigration forms at Ellis Island, and there lay the first step toward what would become Dirk Danger.

Georg filled out the form as best he could; there were some small lies here and there and some bigger ones elsewhere.  He used the names he had arrived at, George Striper for himself and Mary for his wife, and filled in Country of Origin as England.  He was unsure of his ability to land a job as a banker, but had been pretty handy with automobiles in Germany and during the war so filled in his occupation as “Meckanik.”  Spelling was not his strong suit.

The immigrations officer looked over the paperwork, looked over the couple arriving, and nodded them forward.  “Cheerio, old chap,” said the new George Striper.

“Right then, Mr…” began the officer, further perusing the paperwork.  The paperwork seemed to have been designed especially poorly, as though it was purposefully hard to fill out or read.  “Meckanik.”  He said.  It was then that George realized he had made a mistake.  “I see here that it says you are a . . .” the officer looked puzzled.  “Stripper?”

George was too embarrassed to say anything other than to mumble “…striper…” and look away sheepishly.  He took a new identification card upon which had been written George Meckanik and one for his wife.  Luckily, the card did not list an occupation, and perhaps even more luckily his wife spoke almost no English, and so Mary Meckanik, formerly Mary Striper, and even more formerly Maria-Magdalena von Stirpitz, was entirely ignorant of the embarrassment she and her husband had just undergone, and it was with no reluctance whatsoever that she later expanded the Meckanik family with a son and a daughter, George Meckanik, Jr. and Barbara (respectively).

The remainder of George, Sr.’s life was spent in New York State working as a mechanic.  He and his family went through some rough times over the next decade, but emerged relatively unscathed from the Depression, and during the war that followed he was sent off to work as a mechanic in the Pacific. (He couldn’t be sent to Europe due to a rumor that his wife was German, not English.)  He worked to repair airplanes that were coming back from missions, and eventually was promoted to chief mechanic for an entire airbase. Once the war was over, his business took off as automobile purchases soared, and by the time he died in 1956 his business was profitable, and George, Jr. was perfectly happy to carry it on in the family name.

At this point, Junior was about the age his father was when he had come to America, and his mother pestered him in German frequently about finding a nice girl and settling down.  George managed to fulfill his mother’s wishes when he finally met a young blonde named Martha Titely.  The couple met at an “All-American Pie Tasting,” when George tasted Martha’s Famous New England Apple Pie and knew right then and there that he wanted that pie for the rest of his life.  His stable salary and neat little house with a white picket fence that he had been able to buy when his father died were more than enough for her, and the two were married within months of meeting.  Her days were spent using exciting new gadgets like the refrigerator and the washing machine, and she cooked dinner every night and hung out the laundry to dry during the day.  (These were simpler times.)  Every Friday morning, Martha would bake her famous apple pie and leave it on the windowsill to cool for when George, Jr. came home; and later for when their only son Holden came home after school.

Holden Titely Meckanik was equipped with what can only be termed a keen sense of destiny.  He understood that it was perfectly acceptable, and possibly necessary, for a person named Meckanik to work as a mechanic.  In fact, he quite liked how his father’s customers could pretty much guess his dad’s name: “Hey, mechanic, I’ve got something wrong with my truck!” was perfectly acceptable to him.

There were, however, a number of things he did not see as right.  To begin, by the age of ten he knew that his mother was a dying breed.  Quite simply, no one was content to do the wash and the cooking anymore, and he told his mother this.  The idea that, as his friends and his friends’ parents marched around for women’s rights, his mother was having a grand old time ironing, drove him nuts.  And what was even worse was his name.  His father had named him Holden after a character in his favorite book.  But Holden Meckanik was not a great name. It was boring.  It was weird.  It wasn’t funny, and it lent itself to absolutely nothing.

Holden grew up despite this and moved on with his life.  He decided not to be a mechanic, because by that day and age mechanics were not as revered as once they had been.  His father’s business was falling on hard times, and the idea of inheriting it or even working for his father after a few summers in his teenage years didn’t sit too well with him. Holden decided that New York wasn’t the place for him, and when the time came he went to college down south.  It was there that he met a young girl named Maria, a girl whose parents had fled the revolution in Cuba and had settled in Florida.  (In an odd twist of fate, by 1957 the immigration forms had gotten only so much better that when her parents, Emilio and Catalina Colón, left Santiago, they inadvertently became Emilio and Catalina Santiago from Colón.)   In any event, after college the two were married, and they settled in Florida near Maria’s parents.

Soon after moving away from his father’s garage to avoid life as a mechanic and to begin his life as, ironically, a used car salesman, Holden received word from his crying mother that his father had died of a heart attack.  It seemed that Martha’s famous apple pie had eventually caught up with the man and finished him off.  Holden immediately made plans to drive up to New York in a brand new used car (Holden’s favorite phrase) and a court date for when he returned.  He was going to change his name.

He could have settled for any number of great, telling names.  He could have gone with his old standby, Otto, or something more exotic, like Aero.  He could have abandoned everything and come up with his own name, something like Gun Smith or Hida Waye or Pay No Moore, which might have even helped out his business.  But that wasn’t Holden’s style.  When the day came, after much deliberation, and because of his bottled up resentment over his father’s effort at naming him, he scrapped the Meckanik name but kept the rest, and became Holden Titely Danger.  He relished his choice every time he introduced himself to someone as “Danger, Holden Titely.”

It was only a few weeks after the death of George, Jr. that Maria Danger, formerly Maria Meckanik, née Santiago (but very nearly Colón), informed her husband that they would be welcoming a new member of the family. Holden thought long and hard about what to name their child, and had even considered naming the boy after himself, but Danger, Holden Titely, Jr. wasn’t quite as clever, and it certainly wasn’t original anymore.  He decided to name his child Leigh Dusphrom Danger if it was a girl, or simply Dirk for a son.  In the late months of 1987 they gave birth to a bouncing baby boy.

Dirk’s childhood was essentially a normal one.  He went to school like everyone else, played outside, enjoyed going to the beach, and was generally amicable with the other children.  He had plenty of friends and, to all observers, was blossoming into a levelheaded, well-liked young man, destined not necessarily for greatness, but likely to make something of himself as a doctor, or a lawyer, or a dentist.

Yet he and his father knew different.  For all of Dirk’s childhood, Holden passed on to his son much of the wisdom he had accrued in his years.  “Son,” he would say, “It’s great to set your own hours.  But there’s a reason people set them from 9 to 5.”  Or he would say, “Son, appearances can be deceiving, but people can be morons.  Appear to be what you want others to perceive you to be.”

But most importantly, Holden passed on that same sense of destiny that he felt had betrayed him.  “Son,” he would say, “I have given you the greatest gift that a man can give.  I have blessed you with a name that has purpose, a name that has reason.  Your mother has given you a dark complexion and the hint of mystery.  The day will come when you must put down all that you love, and you must answer your true calling.”  And so it was that, growing up, Dirk knew that a man named Dirk Danger would one day have to drop the baseball cleats and playground shorts he was wearing and don a trench coat and a fedora; that Dirk Danger was destined to be a gumshoe.

Mrs. Flora Heartwood, wife of a missing floor specialist, knew none of this.  But if she had, she’d probably be angry just the same.

THE END

The Droids We’re Looking For

Honestly, I haven’t yet read Thomas Piketty’s best-selling economic text Capital in the Twenty-First Century, but I am familiar enough to believe in its main thrust: that wealth is becoming more concentrated in fewer and fewer individuals, and that sustained inequality is bad.  His basic thesis, as I understand it, is that capital sees a higher rate of return than the overall economy, so those who own capital (e.g., employers, or, more classically, the landed gentry, whose wealth may be appreciating in everything from real estate to NBA franchises to intellectual property to equities markets) will see their wealth increase faster than those who earn wages, which are tied to macroeconomic growth.  (Notably, he points out that this wasn’t true in the first half of the 20th Century as a result of two world wars destroying so much capital — if your money is tied up in an English tank factory, and that factory gets bombed by ze Germans, you’re not seeing huge returns on your investment).   It’s not 100% clear that this argument holds weight, due to some controversy in his research, but it does seem conclusive that inequality is rising right now, and will be for the foreseeable future.

I, however, have a different argument for why that is the case.  You guessed it: robot utopia.

Bender_Rodriguez
Or as my dad would say, “Ro-butt utopia”

The basic premise of my theory comes from the fact that robots (or, more generally, automation) are gradually replacing the labor force, leaving more people without steady income and a concentrated few white-collar automation magnates with the majority of the wealth.  There is a lot of debate about whether robots are really taking people’s jobs; in the short term, it seems like increased automation has actually produced jobs, as unemployment unequivocally fell through the first computing boom of the ’90s, for instance.  However, the types of jobs have changed; in particular, we’ve seen a significant decrease in skilled manual labor as manufacturing jobs have moved overseas or been replaced by machines.  The workforce has shifted dramatically away from manufacturing and toward service as a result.  (The immediate cause has more to do with shipping manufacturing overseas, but the reason that this is viable is that in places like Bangladesh, people can legally be treated like machines; in they future, when the people of even the least developed nations have been afforded basic human rights, multinationals won’t pay thousands of people $10.50 / hour plus health insurance and benefits with a 5-minute break every hour and an 8-hour workday in a well-ventilated and ergonomically designed factory to sew our underwear — they’re going to employ three people at $10.50 an hour to supervise the machines doing it, because machines don’t need wages, or benefits, or breaks, or workdays, or ventilation.)  This is exactly what’s already happened in the domestic farming industry, where we now have two or three guys with GPS-guided machines that plant and harvest crops on land that once would have employed hundreds — and even though it displaces agricultural workers, this is a good thing, because humanity can feed and clothe itself more efficiently without exploiting the lower class through back-breaking labor (the same reason it’s ridiculous that an advanced, egalitarian society would build an army out of clone humans, when they can obviously build a droid army instead.  “They’re super loyal and they grow up in 10 years instead of 20” isn’t a convincing argument when you can build a totally programmable droid in 5 minutes and you don’t have to pay it a pension when the war is over, not to mention the moral atrocity that is breeding a human for the explicit purpose of having it get blown up).

Nothing runs like a deere
Pictured: Efficiency

The argument espoused by the anti-robot-utopians is that, for every job that is destroyed by automation, another is created, and to date that has been more-or-less true (there is an argument that, with a decreased workforce and increased automation after the financial crisis, companies were able to sustain profits with fewer people, which is why we’ve seen sticky unemployment numbers even as we have recovered from the recession).  But this has been true solely because there are un-automated industries left for displaced workers to go into — and typically, these industries pay less, hence rising inequality over the last few decades.  When farming automated, people were able to go into manufacturing; as manufacturing has automated, people have gone into service industries (whether consulting, marketing, or waiting tables).  Many older employees have been forced out of the workforce entirely, while the younger generation has reaped the benefit of the new booming automation industry.

As someone who firmly believes in both the human race’s ability to develop powerful technology and the overwhelming desire to act in one’s own best interest, the idea that one day most jobs won’t be automated is short-sighted and fails to reflect the boundless potential of automation technology.  Let’s say you’re a restaurant owner.  You’re faced with the choice of hiring a human worker, to whom you pay $2.17 an hour plus the hidden cost of adding 18% to customers’ food bills, and who gets health insurance and a 15-minute break every 4 hours, and who might provide excellent service, but might also mis-enter an order, or get into a fight with another waiter, or miss a shift; alternatively, you can buy a $100,000 automated system that requires monthly maintenance, but it never takes a break, doesn’t need health insurance, doesn’t get tipped, never mis-enters an order, never fights with the other robot-waiters, responds immediately to customers’ needs without needing to be flagged down, can serve twice as many tables, and never misses a shift.  Which do you go for?  You will buy the robotic system; you’ve decreased the cost to customers (their food is a bit more expensive, because it includes service, but they don’t have to tip), you can stay open twenty-four hours for the same cost as staying open 8 or 16 hours, you’ve increased the baseline level of service, and you’ve mitigated the risk of poor service at a relatively flat cost, so you’re acting in your own best interest to buy it, regardless of how many service-industry employees you put out of business.

robocop
Depending on the robot, you can also decrease your dine-and-dash risk.

And that’s just one example; now apply that to everything from cab drivers (the self-driving car is probably less than 10 years away from viability) to consultants (imagine Siri or Watson in 50 years), and tell me what options are left for the majority of the workforce.

If you’re thinking of huge productivity gains as our existing workforce transitions to managing the automated one, think again.  While this is the case now (and is a principal cause of the rise in productivity over the last two decades), automation is still a young industry, which means that many other industries haven’t been automated, but it also means that the automation industry itself hasn’t been automated. This means that, for every automated task, we still need a human to oversee that automation.  In the restaurant example above, we would have a manager of some sort to ensure that nothing was going wrong — customers understand how to use the system, it hasn’t broken down, the robot is refilling people’s drinks correctly, etc.  We still have humans on automated factory floors ensuring that the process is working as intended.  My favorite automation project, the self-driving car, will probably need to have humans who can override the automation in emergencies for at least 10-20 years before the kinks have been worked out and these machines can be trusted. But as the technology matures, we won’t need human oversight anymore; automated restaurants and self-driving cars won’t seem like risky gimmicks, they’ll be commonplace, because the systems will perform unequivocally better than a human could.  Bugs will eventually get worked out to the point where the technology is mature, and the automation oversight process itself will be automated — if something breaks down, it will eventually be automatically detected and dealt with.

terminator
Eventually they’ll have to automate the process of firing people who have been replaced by robots.

So where does that leave people?  For the most part, real “work” as we know it today will be done for us; we won’t need jobs as we do now, because those jobs are based on the premise that you produce something for society, and society rewards you with the ability to purchase the products of its other members, but we won’t be able to produce anything for society as well as a machine can.  People will have time to focus on whatever most interests them, whether that be art, learning, or sloth.  But at the same time, we’ll still live in a world of limited resources; classical economics doesn’t just go out the window, and there will be only a small group of people who produce anything of value to society — principally, the people who own the automation-producing capital.

This is the singular crisis of the 21st Century, to me.  If done correctly, it can lead to the robot utopia; if not, it could lead to inequality, poverty, and ultimately the demise of civilization as we know it.  To do this correctly, society will need to acknowledge that we are free enough from want that we can support non-productive human life (or potentially redefine productivity).  It is not reasonable to expect that every member of society will be qualified to work on the increasingly complex systems we will have in place, and if we do not accept a comfortable minimum quality of life for such people, chaos may reign (whether it be from class warfare, subjugation of the masses, or the ultimate demise of the lower class, whose existence will be driving the need for the automation barons’ products).  At the same time, while no one person needs to work, there will likely still be a need for people to work, and we must continue to incentivize this work in order to allow society to advance rather than falling into a classic tragedy of the commons scenario.  Why would anyone risk their capital or work toward innovative solutions to society’s inefficiencies if they weren’t properly rewarded for it?  If we cannot incentivize the 1% who continue to produce, we will stagnate or revert as our systems break down around us, because it will always be somebody else’s problem.

Here is where we return to Piketty’s ideas about inequality.  We are left in a world where a tiny few have everything, and everyone else has nothing — so how do we get around it?  Piketty suggests a wealth tax — tax the wealthiest cut of society at a rate that still incentivizes them to gain wealth, and use the money from that tax to instate a safety net for the remainder of the population.  Note that this is not communism, nor even true socialism — there is no collective ownership or central planning agency, and the goal is not income equality, which would disincentivize  the wealthy from producing.  Instead, the idea is to provide everyone with enough capital to live comfortably (an amount that hopefully grows over time, as society continues to innovate and improve), and which they can choose to spend freely, while maintaining upward mobility through the possibility of investing that capital in themselves or production of a different kind (e.g., art).  The rich will still be rich; they will have more than the average citizen, which provides incentives for average citizens to want to become rich themselves, and those who do not possess the necessary skills to continue producing have the choice of investing in themselves to gain them or to continue living comfortably, but not richly, in society.

This is just one of many possible solutions, and there’s obviously a lot that has been left unexplored here.  It would be impossible to say how society will advance over the next 50-100 years, both domestically and globally, and there are an infinite number of possible futures that don’t involve a robot utopia.  At the same time, there is no doubt that automation has the potential to radically change the world that we live in, and if it does, we will need to address those changes in a way that pushes society forward, not backward.